AI and Human Rights: Navigating the New Frontier of Value

The New Human Rights Question: What is a Person Worth When Intelligence is Unbundled?

Does a person have a right to privacy when an algorithm knows their needs better than they do? What does freedom of thought mean when our news feeds are curated to elicit a specific emotional response? These are no longer abstract questions. As artificial intelligence becomes deeply embedded in our society, we are forced to confront a new generation of human rights challenges. A recent report revealed that in a staggering 55 out of 70 countries, individuals faced legal repercussions for their online expression, a trend increasingly amplified by AI-driven monitoring. This signals a critical juncture where the very definition of human value is being contested.

From the perspective of J.Y. Sterling’s seminal book, "The Great Unbundling," this is an inevitable consequence of separating human capabilities. For millennia, our legal and social structures have been built on the assumption of a "bundled" human—a single entity possessing intelligence, emotion, and agency. Now, AI is systematically unbundling these functions, creating a world where our laws, ethics, and very understanding of human rights are struggling to keep pace. This article will explore the landscape of AI human rights, examining how this technological revolution is forcing a radical re-evaluation of our most fundamental protections.

For the AI-Curious Professional, this piece will demystify how AI is reshaping legal and ethical boundaries in business and society. The Philosophical Inquirer will find a deep dive into how AI challenges the foundations of humanism and individual worth. And the Aspiring AI Ethicist/Researcher will gain a structured understanding of the key battlegrounds where human rights and artificial intelligence collide, backed by current data and real-world examples.

Part I: The Unbundling of Dignity - AI's Challenge to Core Human Rights

The traditional human rights framework, established in the wake of World War II, was designed to protect the inherent dignity of the "bundled" individual. But as AI isolates and optimizes functions once unique to humans, it creates novel pressures on these long-held principles. As J.Y. Sterling argues in "The Great Unbundling," capitalism acts as the engine for this process, relentlessly pursuing efficiency and profit, often at the expense of human-centric values.

The Right to Privacy in an Age of Algorithmic Surveillance

The right to privacy is arguably the first casualty of the unbundling. AI-powered systems, by their very nature, are data-hungry. They thrive on the vast troves of personal information we generate daily. This has led to a surveillance infrastructure of unprecedented scale and subtlety.

Pervasive Monitoring: Governments and corporations alike are deploying sophisticated AI for monitoring public spaces, online activities, and even our private lives. A 2025 report from Human Rights Watch highlights the use of mass cellphone searches and "anti-fraud" apps that double as surveillance tools.
Predictive Policing and Pre-crime Analysis: Law enforcement agencies are increasingly using AI to predict where crimes might occur and who might commit them. While touted as a tool for efficiency, these systems often rely on biased historical data, leading to the over-policing of marginalized communities and creating a chilling effect on civil liberties.
Consumer Data and Manipulation: Beyond state surveillance, corporations are unbundling our consumer choices from our conscious decisions. A staggering 81% of U.S. adults believe the data companies collect will be used in ways they are not comfortable with. This data is not just used for targeted advertising; it's used to shape our behaviors and preferences, blurring the line between persuasion and manipulation.

Equality and Non-Discrimination: The Rise of Algorithmic Bias

One of the most pressing artificial intelligence and human rights issues is algorithmic bias. AI systems learn from data, and if that data reflects existing societal biases, the AI will not only replicate but also amplify and automate discrimination at a massive scale.

Hiring and Employment: In a landmark 2024 case, Mobley v. Workday, Inc., allegations were made that an AI-powered hiring tool discriminated against applicants based on race, age, and disability. This case illustrates the unbundling of hiring decisions from human recruiters, replacing nuanced judgment with potentially biased automated screening.
Credit and Lending: AI models are now widely used to determine creditworthiness. However, these systems can perpetuate historical discrimination, denying loans and financial opportunities to individuals from certain racial or socioeconomic backgrounds, even when traditional protected characteristics are removed from the data.
The Justice System: The use of AI in the justice system, from risk assessments for bail and sentencing to facial recognition for identifying suspects, is fraught with peril. Studies have consistently shown that facial recognition technologies have higher error rates for women and people of color, leading to wrongful arrests and the erosion of due process. UNESCO has raised significant concerns about the opacity of these systems, which clashes with the fundamental principles of open justice.

Part II: The Unbundled Mind - Freedom of Thought and Expression

The unbundling of information from truth and public discourse from genuine connection poses a profound threat to freedom of expression. AI is not just a tool for communication; it is actively shaping the informational ecosystem in which our thoughts and opinions are formed.

Content Moderation and Censorship

Social media platforms rely heavily on AI to moderate content at scale. While necessary to combat hate speech and other harmful content, these systems often lack the contextual understanding of human moderators.

Over-Censorship: AI's inability to grasp nuance and satire can lead to the wrongful removal of legitimate political speech, artistic expression, and journalism. Freedom House reports that in at least 21 countries, governments are mandating or incentivizing platforms to use machine learning to remove disfavored political and social speech.
The Chilling Effect: When individuals know their online activities are being constantly monitored and judged by opaque algorithms, they are less likely to express dissenting or controversial opinions, leading to a more homogenous and less vibrant public sphere.

The Disinformation Machine

Generative AI has supercharged the creation and dissemination of disinformation, making it cheaper and easier than ever to sow discord and manipulate public opinion. This represents the unbundling of content creation from accountability.

Deepfakes and Synthetic Media: Malicious actors can now create highly realistic but entirely fake videos and audio recordings to defame political opponents, create social unrest, or influence elections.
Automated Propaganda: Governments and political actors are deploying bot networks and AI-generated content to create the illusion of grassroots support for their policies and to drown out dissenting voices. A recent Freedom House report found that at least 47 governments used such tactics to manipulate online discussions.

Part III: The Unbundled Future - Economic Rights and the Value of Humanity

As AI continues to unbundle skills and intelligence from the human worker, we face a potential future where large segments of the population are economically displaced. This raises fundamental questions about the right to work, the right to an adequate standard of living, and the very economic value of a human being.

The Threat of Mass Automation

Goldman Sachs has estimated that as many as 300 million full-time jobs could be exposed to automation by generative AI. This is not just about blue-collar jobs; white-collar, creative, and analytical roles are now at risk. The unbundling of cognitive labor from the human mind is a core tenet of J.Y. Sterling's thesis and presents a significant challenge to our current economic models.

The Case for Universal Basic Income (UBI)

In a world where the economic value of bundled human capabilities is diminished, the concept of a Universal Basic Income is gaining traction not as a mere policy choice, but as a potential civilizational necessity. A UBI could provide a safety net for those displaced by automation and ensure that everyone has the means to meet their basic needs.

Part IV: The Great Re-bundling - A Human-Centered Response

The unbundling of human capabilities by AI is not a deterministic process that we must passively accept. As J.Y. Sterling argues, the counter-current to this trend is "The Great Re-bundling"—a conscious and collective effort to reassert human values and create new forms of purpose.

A Human Rights-Based Approach to AI Governance

To mitigate the risks of AI, we must embed human rights principles into the entire lifecycle of these technologies, from design and development to deployment and oversight.

Transparency and Explainability: Individuals have a right to know when AI is being used to make decisions that affect them and to understand the logic behind those decisions. This is crucial for challenging biased or inaccurate outcomes.
Human-in-the-Loop: For high-stakes decisions, particularly in areas like justice, healthcare, and social services, a human must remain in the loop to provide oversight, context, and ethical judgment. The UN Secretary-General has emphasized that "humanity must never be left to the 'black box' of an algorithm."
Accountability and Remedy: When AI systems cause harm, there must be clear legal frameworks for establishing accountability and providing effective remedies for victims. This includes holding the developers, deployers, and users of AI systems responsible for their impacts.

Creating New Human Purpose

The ultimate challenge posed by AI is not just economic or legal; it is philosophical. If AI can out-perform us in the tasks that once defined our value, then what is our purpose? The "Great Re-bundling" suggests that our future lies in emphasizing the capabilities that cannot be easily replicated by machines: empathy, creativity, critical thinking, and ethical reasoning. It is about intentionally re-bundling our skills in new and uniquely human ways.

The conversation about AI human rights is a conversation about the future of humanity itself. It requires us to look beyond the immediate technological advancements and to ask ourselves what kind of society we want to build.

To delve deeper into the "Great Unbundling" framework and its implications for our future, purchase your copy of J.Y. Sterling's "The Great Unbundling: How Artificial Intelligence is Redefining the Value of a Human Being."

[Link to Book Purchase Page]

Sign up for our newsletter to receive ongoing analysis and insights into the intersection of AI and humanity.

[Newsletter Signup Form]

AI Human Rights